Our website is currently under maintenance as we transition into a new period of ARC Greater Manchester funding from 1st April 2026 - 31st March 2031. Information about our new research themes, programme and activities will be available soon

Skip to content

Accessibility

Resources


We are committed to ensure that our work is used in practice, influences decision making and assists with the design of future work; as part of this we have made all of our resources freely available to download.

Please complete the following form to download this item:


Once submitting your information you will be presented with a new 'Download' button to gain access to the resource.


Do systematic reviews address community healthcare professionals’ wound care uncertainties? Results from evidence mapping in wound care.


Author(s): Christie J, Gray T, Dumville J & Cullum N

Journal: Plos One


Work completed under CLAHRC GM

Download

Opportunities for Better Value Wound Care: investigating the prevalence and management of complex wounds in a UK community population
Barriers and facilitators to preventing pressure ulcers in nursing home residents: a qualitative analysis informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework and COM-B model
The effects of care bundles on patient outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis


Author(s): Lavallee J, Gray Y, Dumville J & Cullum N

Journal: Implementation Science


Work completed under CLAHRC GM

Download

How do managerial techniques evolve over time? The distortion of “facilitation” in healthcare service improvement


Author(s): Kislov R, Humphreys J & Harvey G

Journal: Public Management Review


Work completed under CLAHRC GM

Download

The spatial politics of place and health policy: Examining sustainability and transformation plans
Skill-mix change and the general practice workforce challenge
Adding the past to the policy mix: An historical approach to the issue of access to general practice in England
Institutional work and innovation in the NHS: the role of creating and disrupting (book chapter)
Does access to a demand-led evidence briefing service improve uptake and use of research evidence by health service commissioners? A controlled before and after study.
Effects of a demand-led evidence briefing service on the uptake and use of research evidence by commissioners of health services: a controlled before and after study.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33
 

Please complete the following form to download this item:


Once submitting your information you will be presented with a new 'Download' button to gain access to the resource.