Our website is currently under maintenance as we transition into a new period of ARC Greater Manchester funding from 1st April 2026 - 31st March 2031. Information about our new research themes, programme and activities will be available soon

Skip to content

Accessibility

Resources


We are committed to ensure that our work is used in practice, influences decision making and assists with the design of future work; as part of this we have made all of our resources freely available to download.

Please complete the following form to download this item:


Once submitting your information you will be presented with a new 'Download' button to gain access to the resource.


Skill-mix change and the general practice workforce challenge
Adding the past to the policy mix: An historical approach to the issue of access to general practice in England
Institutional work and innovation in the NHS: the role of creating and disrupting (book chapter)
Does access to a demand-led evidence briefing service improve uptake and use of research evidence by health service commissioners? A controlled before and after study.
Effects of a demand-led evidence briefing service on the uptake and use of research evidence by commissioners of health services: a controlled before and after study.
Proceedings from the 9th annual conference on the science of dissemination and implementation: Washington, DC, USA. 14-15 December 2016.


Author(s): Chambers D, Simpson L, Neta G, et al.

Journal:


Work completed under CLAHRC GM

Download

Social prescribing: less rhetoric and more reality. A systematic review of the evidence
What are the combined effects of negative emotions and illness cognitions on self-care in people with type 2 diabetes? A longitudinal structural equation model
Long term cost-effectiveness of collaborative care (versus usual care) for people with depression and comorbid diabetes or cardiovascular disease: a Markov model informed by the COINCIDE randomised controlled trial
The role of boundary spanners in delivering collaborative care – a process evaluation
Involving healthcare professionals and family carers in setting research priorities for end-of-life care
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32
 

Please complete the following form to download this item:


Once submitting your information you will be presented with a new 'Download' button to gain access to the resource.